Contacts, documents and full notice history are available with a subscription.
Special Notice NONE Expired 1 notice

Service Desk Artificial Intelligence Market Research W519TC-26-R-0010

Solicitation W519TC-26-R-0010 Copied Notice ID 4092de25bd72430581a7ffcd14884730 Copied DEPT OF DEFENSE — ACC RI
SAM.gov
Posted
Dec 19, 2025
Deadline
Jan 08, 2026
Set-aside
NONE
NAICS
541519
PSC
DD01

Summary

AI-generated · Dec 20, 2025

Industry feedback is requested through RFIs for market research on outsourced IT Service Management (ITSM) service desk/centers, focusing on the impact of Artificial Intelligence on operations, metrics reporting, and support agreements. Historically, contracts are sized by agent labor, but AI and self-help tools can reduce labor and shift how the service desk operates, how performance is measured, and how agreements are structured.

Provide guidance on how to leverage AI to deliver the highest customer experience and fastest ticket resolution, including: how to migrate tasks from live agents to AI over time; how to train AI models to minimize bias and maintain accurate, contextually relevant responses; how often AI should be updated to handle issues it cannot resolve; identifying tasks that always require live agents; use of AI as surge capacity; recommended staff training resources; limits of AI deployment in IL4/IL5/IL6 environments; incorporating DoD security knowledge bases; metrics to measure AI adoption and performance; target percentage of Tier 0/Tier 1 tickets resolved by AI; how to measure the size/value of the total support agreement when AI reduces labor; and how to structure SLAs/KPIs and any incentives or penalties tied to AI adoption.

LOCATION NOT SPECIFIC RFIs for Industry Market Research on Outsourced IT Service Management Support Desk / Centers The Army requests Industry feedback on the impact of artificial intelligence (A.I.) to service desk operations, metrics reporting, and support agreements. Context: Historical commercial contact center support agreements typically have been sized based upon the amount of agent labor required as measured by customers, contacts, or recorded tickets. Once in place, support agreement performance may be measured based on a contact, or cost per ticket model with required SLAs/KPIs for service desk responsiveness, resolution rates, customer satisfaction, and overall customer experience. With the continuing evolution of A.I., A.I. and self help can be leveraged to reduce agent and other support labor, changing the focus of operations, metrics reporting, and support agreement structure. Summary Question: When leveraging A.I., what adjustments in service desk operations, metrics, and support agreements enable the highest customer experience, facilitate quick ticket resolution, and provide the most value? Operations Specific Questions: How do you prioritize and promote migration of tasks from live agents to AI over time? How do you manage A.I. implementation to ensure that A.I. models are trained to minimize biases and consistently produce accurate, contextually relevant responses? How often do you modify the A.I. to address service desk issues not able to be resolved by A.I.? Do you see any trends generally in the type of calls, contacts, or support tasks that appear to always require live agent intervention? Do you use A.I. to provide surge capacity? Please describe. What training resources do you recommend to help staff adapt to the new operational service delivery model leveraging A.I.? What do you see as limitations on A.I. deployment existing in each of the IL4, IL5, and IL6 operating environments? How would you incorporate Department of Defense security compliance knowledge base into A.I. to ensure response is within acceptable security classification guide guidance? Metrics Specific Questions: What metrics do you use or recommend to measure A.I. adoption and performance? Do you establish a percentage of Tier 0/Tier 1 tickets to be fully resolved by A.I. without human intervention? Support Agreement Questions: With A.I. implemented reducing agent or other support labor requirements, what support elements do you use to measure the size and value of the total support agreement? With A.I. used in operations replacing agent labor, what metrics do you establish as support agreement SLAs or KPIs? Are any A.I. adoption or performance metrics tied to specific incentives/disincentives or penalties in the support agreement?

From Special Notice posted on Dec 19, 2025

Notice history

1
  1. Special Notice LATEST Posted Dec 19, 2025 View

Details

Solicitation number W519TC-26-R-0010
Notice ID 4092de25bd72430581a7ffcd14884730
Notice type Special Notice
Product / Service (PSC) DD01
NAICS 541519
Set-aside No Set aside used
Place of performance Rock Island, Illinois
Archive date Feb 06, 2026

Award Information

Not yet awarded

Documents

No files available

View on SAM.gov

Contacts

primary
Shelly Robacker

Email

Phone

secondary
Andrew Ritchie

Email

Agency

DEPT OF DEFENSE
DEPT OF THE ARMY
AMC
ACC
ACC-CTRS
ACC RI

Place of Performance

Rock Island, Illinois
USA

Dates

Posted Dec 19, 2025 7 months ago
Last Updated Aug 06, 2026 1 day ago
Due Jan 08, 2026 6 months ago