Radford Army Ammunition Plant - DRAFT Solicitation #2 W519TC-26-R-00003

23 Feb 2026 - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Draft Solicitation #2 for Industry Feedback NOTES: 1. Due to system issues, the Government is posting the narrative-only versions of the solicitation Sections at this time. The full solicitation will be posted at a later date. The Attachments available are still included with this posting; several attachments are still pending. PWS 8 and additional incumbent Transition details will be posted at a later date. Attachment 0019 Price Matrix will be posted within a few days of this posting. 2. Attached to this announcement is a "Request for Information - Transfer of Spare Parts" for Industry Feedback related to strategy for the competitive follow-on contract. 3. Regarding the RFAAP Competitive solicitation, the Government is requesting feedback on the following areas specifically: a. Revamped Sections C, L and M (definitions, requirements, strategies, deliverables, etc). Request feedback on this strategy vs. the prior L&M posted in December 2025. b. NC Fines/Legacy Waste - Does this fit best in the Integrated Waste Stream Management Plan as currently built in Section L, or should it move to Facility Reset Plan? What does Industry need from the Government in order to price this requirement as a separately priced FFP CLIN?

Update 25 Feb 2026 Re-uploaded Attachment 0001, 0002, and 0006 due to accessibility issues. 23 Feb 2026 - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Draft Solicitation #2 for Industry Feedback NOTES: 1. Due to system issues, the Government is posting the narrative-only versions of the solicitation Sections at this time. The full solicitation will be posted at a later date. The Attachments available are still included with this posting; several attachments are still pending. PWS 8 and additional incumbent Transition details will be posted at a later date. Attachment 0019 Price Matrix will be posted within a few days of this posting. 2. Attached to this announcement is a "Request for Information - Transfer of Spare Parts" for Industry Feedback related to strategy for the competitive follow-on contract. 3. Regarding the RFAAP Competitive solicitation, the Government is requesting feedback on the following areas specifically: a. Revamped Sections C, L and M (definitions, requirements, strategies, deliverables, etc). Request feedback on this strategy vs. the prior L&M posted in December 2025. b. NC Fines/Legacy Waste - Does this fit best in the Integrated Waste Stream Management Plan as currently built in Section L, or should it move to Facility Reset Plan? What does Industry need from the Government in order to price this requirement as a separately priced FFP CLIN?

Update 04 June 2026 Post RFAAP Draft RFP #2 Industry Q&A. Update 25 Feb 2026 Re-uploaded Attachment 0001, 0002, and 0006 due to accessibility issues. 23 Feb 2026 - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Draft Solicitation #2 for Industry Feedback NOTES: 1. Due to system issues, the Government is posting the narrative-only versions of the solicitation Sections at this time. The full solicitation will be posted at a later date. The Attachments available are still included with this posting; several attachments are still pending. PWS 8 and additional incumbent Transition details will be posted at a later date. Attachment 0019 Price Matrix will be posted within a few days of this posting. 2. Attached to this announcement is a "Request for Information - Transfer of Spare Parts" for Industry Feedback related to strategy for the competitive follow-on contract. 3. Regarding the RFAAP Competitive solicitation, the Government is requesting feedback on the following areas specifically: a. Revamped Sections C, L and M (definitions, requirements, strategies, deliverables, etc). Request feedback on this strategy vs. the prior L&M posted in December 2025. b. NC Fines/Legacy Waste - Does this fit best in the Integrated Waste Stream Management Plan as currently built in Section L, or should it move to Facility Reset Plan? What does Industry need from the Government in order to price this requirement as a separately priced FFP CLIN?