Contacts, documents and full notice history are available with a subscription.
Solicitation Expired 1 notice 25 documents

Exponentiating Mathematics (expMath) HR001125S0010

Solicitation HR001125S0010 Copied Notice ID fb8136c6d9cf41e3bd1f87fb519e7551 Copied DEPT OF DEFENSE — DEF ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGCY
SAM.gov
Posted
Jun 10, 2025
Deadline
Jul 15, 2025
Set-aside
None
NAICS
541715
PSC
AC12

Summary

AI-generated · Aug 23, 2025

Radically accelerate progress in pure mathematics by using AI to address two main bottlenecks: automatically decomposing problems into useful, generalizable lemmas, and speeding up the process of proving those lemmas. Right now, breaking problems into lemmas is a manual, labor-intensive step, and even when lemmas are reusable, constructing rigorous proofs is slow and iterative, often requiring substantial follow-up work to fix gaps.

The effort focuses on formalization in programming languages and automated theorem proving (e.g., Lean, Isabelle) to enable autoformalization and automated proof of lemmas. While tools like Blueprint for Lean exist to help structure math and code, current approaches fall short for graduate-level problems. The goal is to develop methods and tools that automate decomposition, formalization, and proof to dramatically increase the pace of mathematical discovery.

MATHEMATICS IS THE SOURCE OF SIGNIFICANT TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES; HOWEVER, PROGRESS IN MATH IS SLOW. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) suggest the possibility of increasing the rate of progress in mathematics. Still, a wide gap exists between state-of-the-art AI capabilities and pure mathematics research. Advances in mathematics are slow for two reasons. First, decomposing problems into useful lemmas is a laborious and manual process. To advance the field of mathematics, mathematicians use their knowledge and experience to explore candidate lemmas, which, when composed together, prove theorems. Ideally, these lemmas are generalizable beyond the specifics of the current problem so they can be easily understood and ported to new contexts. Second, proving candidate lemmas is slow, effortful, and iterative. Putative proofs may have gaps, such as the one in Wiles original proof of Fermat s last theorem, which necessitated more than a year of additional work to fix. In theory, formalization in programming languages, such as Lean, could help automate proofs, but translation from math to code and back remains exceedingly difficult. The significant recent advances in AI fall short of the automated decomposition or auto(in)formalization challenges. Decomposition in formal settings is currently a manual process, as seen in the Prime number theorem and beyond and the Polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa conjecture, with existing tools, such as Blueprint for Lean, only facilitating the structuring of math and code. Auto(in)formalization is an active area of research in the AI literature, but current approaches show poor performance and have not yet advanced to even graduate-level textbook problems. Formal languages with automated theorem-proving tools, such as Lean and Isabelle, have traction in the community for problems where the investment in manual formalization is worth it. The goal of expMath is to radically accelerate the rate of progress in pure mathematic

From Solicitation posted on Jun 10, 2025

Notice history

1
  1. Solicitation LATEST Posted Jun 10, 2025 View

Details

Solicitation number HR001125S0010
Notice ID fb8136c6d9cf41e3bd1f87fb519e7551
Notice type Solicitation
Product / Service (PSC) AC12
NAICS 541715
Archive date Aug 07, 2025

Award Information

Not yet awarded