Arbitrator Services ACQ-26-0674
Summary
AI-generated · Jan 21, 2026Arbitration services are required to hear grievances related to the administration and management of the USPTO, with a standing panel jointly selected to handle disputes. The procurement uses an Alternative Competition Method under PTAG and the USPTO Efficiency Act, and no competitive solicitation will be issued because the arbitrator has already been agreed to by both parties for continuity and fairness.
The government intends to award a Purchase Order for approximately a 12-month period to Mr. Javits Joshua, who is the only known qualified source for this matter. Substitution at this stage would risk inconsistency and duplication of effort, so the arbitrator will be retained to complete the matter as a neutral facilitator under the applicable authority allowing noncompetitive procurement for neutrals.
The Office of General Law (OGL) provides general litigation and advisory services on matters concerning the administration and management of the USPTO. The parties have jointly selected arbitrators, including Mr. Javits Joshua, to serve on a standing panel to hear grievances brought by the parties. For this procurement, the USPTO is exempt from the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) as the subject requirement is being procured using the Alternative Competition Method in accordance with the Patent and Trademark Office Acquisition Guidelines (PTAG) and the Patent and Trademark Office Efficiency Act 35 U.S.C.2(b)(4)(A). The full text is located here: https://federal register.gov/a/2013-24316. The USPTO intends to negotiate and award a Purchase Order for Arbitration Services under NAICS Code 541199 All Other Legal Services to Mr. Javits Joshua (UEI: HJ2RX9MTSKL5) 2510 Virginia Ave, NW Unit 1045-N Washington, DC 20037, for an estimated period of performance comprised of twelve (12) months. The anticipated award date is January 30, 2026. For this instance, Mr. Javits is the only known qualified source since he has already been agreed to by both parties. Accordingly, for reasons of continuity, efficiency, and fairness to the parties, it is essential that this arbitrator be retained to complete the matter. Substitution at this stage would not only risk inconsistency and duplication of effort, but would also undermine the integrity of the process. It is the best interest of the Government and consistent with USPTO s statutory authority to proceed with this arbitrator through the conclusion of this case. Moreover, FAR 6.302-3(b)(3)(ii) specifically allows for the use of other than full and open competition to procure, A neutral person, e.g., mediators or arbitrators, to facilitate the resolution of issues in an alternative dispute resolution process. This notice of intent is not a request for competitive proposals nor will a solicitation be issued to the public. Any questions regarding this notice must be submitted in writing via email to the following point of contact or alternate point of contact no later than 5:00pm EDT on January 23, 2026. NO PHONE CALLS PLEASE. Points of Contact: Joy Pitts, Contracting Officer, joy.pitts@uspto.gov Alternate Point of Contact: Emalee Gawrelski, Contracting Officer, emalee.gawrelski@uspto.gov
From Special Notice posted on Jan 20, 2026Notice history
1Details
Award Information
Not yet awarded
Agency
Place of Performance
USA